AU Parliament
Sign in
◆ Topic · everything under one theme

Parliament

3 items · bills, debates and Question Time, gathered. ← All topics

Debates
Motion · HouseRejected 38–101
Parliament · Committee leadership rules

Require the foreign affairs committee's deputy chair to be an opposition MP — back it or block it?

The government moved to restructure the Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, including a rule that its deputy chair be any "non-Government member". The Coalition's Dan Tehan moved an amendment to instead require the deputy chair be specifically an opposition member, arguing this preserves a long tradition of a government chair and opposition deputy on this bipartisan, nationally important committee.

Leader of the House Tony Burke opposed the change, noting the current deputy chair is already an opposition senator and the resolution did not force a new election. The amendment was defeated 38 votes to 101.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.
🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 13m debated
📄 House Hansard, 2 Jul 2026 — Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Joint Committee; Appointment
drill in ▸close ▾
The strongest case each way
For · CoalitionDan Tehan argued the committee has a long tradition of a government chair and an opposition deputy, and that this bipartisan arrangement should be locked in to protect the committee's important national-interest work. Cameron Caldwell backed him, saying the distinct roles of government and opposition should not be watered down.
Against · Government (Labor)Tony Burke said the change was unnecessary because the committee's deputy chair is already an opposition senator, Dean Smith, and the resolution did not require a fresh election for the position.
Motion · SenatePassed 36–29
Parliament · Senate sitting hours and business schedule

Set a fast-tracked timetable to push tax reform bills through the Senate this sitting period — back it or block it?

The government moved to suspend the normal rules and fix the Senate's sitting hours and order of business for the coming days. The schedule sets specific times to debate and vote on a set of bills — including the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No. 1) Bill and related tax and appropriation bills — and caps how long each can be debated before a vote is forced. The government shut down debate at several points to bring the timetable to a vote. It passed five separate divisions, each 36 votes to 29 with 4 pairs. The Coalition attacked the arrangement as a deal with the Greens to rush through tax changes.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.
🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 25m debated
📄 Senate Hansard, 23 Jun 2026 — Days and Hours of Meeting
drill in ▸close ▾
The strongest case each way
For · Government (Labor)Moved to lock in set sitting hours and a fixed order of business so the Senate could get through the tax reform bills and appropriation bills within the sitting period, using time limits to bring each to a vote.
Against · Coalition (Michaelia Cash)Called it a "dirty deal" between Labor and the Greens to rush through regressive tax changes to negative gearing and capital gains that break the Prime Minister's pre-election promises, and pledged a future Coalition government would repeal them.
Motion · SenatePassed 32–20
Parliament · How a social media bill is handled

Send the social media enforcement bill (and a gambling law bill) to a committee inquiry before debate — back it or block it?

The government asked the Senate to fast-track its Online Safety Amendment (Strengthening Enforcement for the Social Media Minimum Age) Bill 2026 by skipping the usual waiting rules so it could be debated this sitting period.

The Coalition's Sarah Henderson moved to instead refer the bill to a Senate committee for inquiry, reporting by 25 August 2026. The Greens' Sarah Hanson-Young added that any bill changing the Interactive Gambling Act introduced on 1 or 2 July also be sent to that committee, reporting by 17 August. All three questions passed 32 votes to 20, so the bill and the gambling matter go to committee scrutiny.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.
🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 13m debated
📄 Senate Hansard, 1 Jul 2026 — Consideration of Legislation
drill in ▸close ▾
The strongest case each way
For · Sarah Hanson-Young (Greens)Moved to add any new gambling-law bill to the committee inquiry, expanding the scrutiny to cover changes to the Interactive Gambling Act alongside the social media bill.
For · CoalitionSarah Henderson argued the social media enforcement bill should go to a Senate committee for inquiry and report by 25 August 2026 rather than being rushed straight to debate.
Against · Government (Labor)Jess Walsh, for Senator Watt, sought to set aside the normal waiting rules so the bill could be considered during this sitting period without a referral.
Bills, debates and Question Time — one theme, every angle.