Ban gas industry lobbyists from Parliament during the gas tax debate, cancel their sponsored passes, and disclose ministers' meetings with them — back it or block it?

The Greens moved an urgency motion calling on the government to stop meeting gas industry representatives and lobbyists while the taxation of gas exports is being debated, cancel their sponsored parliamentary passes, and publish all meetings between ministers and the gas industry over the past year. The Greens argued the gas lobby has too much access and that Australia gets little return from its gas exports. Labor, the Coalition and One Nation opposed banning any industry from talking to government, and independent David Pocock backed more transparency but not an outright ban. The Senate rejected the motion 30 votes to 10.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.

🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 37m debated

📄 Senate Hansard, 22 Jun 2026 — Gas Industry: Taxation

drill in ▸close ▾

The strongest case each way

For · Australian GreensThe Greens said the gas lobby walks the halls of Parliament like it owns the place while ordinary people can't get a meeting, pointing to FOI documents showing nearly 200 text messages between Woodside and officials during project negotiations. They argued Australia gets almost nothing back for hundreds of billions in gas exports, and that shutting out lobbyists and publishing ministerial diaries would break what they call a cosy relationship between Labor and the industry.

Against · CoalitionSenator McDonald called it an attempt at 'stopping democracy' by blocking one sector for ideological reasons. She argued every industry has a right to raise policy concerns with their representatives, and that Labor's interventions have already made the gas market more complex and less secure, risking the collapse of domestic producers.

Against · Government (Labor)Labor said banning people whose ideas you dislike is dangerous and undemocratic, and that good policy requires listening to affected industries. They argued gas is a vital export and firming fuel for the energy transition, and pointed to their own record: oil and gas paid almost $12 billion in tax in 2023-24, PRRT changes raised revenue, and a WA-style gas reservation scheme is being introduced.

Against · One NationSenator Whitten called mandating that politicians ignore key stakeholders 'peak socialist rhetoric' and likened decision-making without consultation to a dictatorship. One Nation said it wants more gas production and a better return for Australians, and defends consulting widely across the industry.

Mixed · David Pocock (Ind)Pocock agreed vested interests have too much sway and again called for a 25 per cent gas export tax, but said governments should talk to the industries they regulate. He backed the recently announced transparency measures on parliamentary access rather than an outright ban on any industry.