AU Parliament
Sign in
◆ Bill · its whole journey
← The Floor ·
Bill · SenatePassed 32–23
Tax · Capital gains and negative gearing changes

Fast-track Labor's tax reform bills through their first stage — back it or block it?

The government moved to bring on two tax bills quickly — skipping the usual formalities, taking them together and reading them a first time. The package would change capital gains tax and negative gearing rules. The Coalition tried to have the fast-track handled as a separate question so it could argue against it, saying the bills had been rushed through a short, inadequate Senate inquiry and would raise taxes on housing, savings, small business and family wealth. The government moved to end the debate and pushed the bills through their first stage 32 votes to 23. The full second-reading debate on the bills' merits is still to come.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.
🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 27m debated
In progress · before its first chamber

⚖ The case each way

For · Government (Labor)The government moved to bring the two tax bills on without the usual delays, take them together and read them a first time, and moved to cut off further debate so the bills could progress.
Against · Coalition (Claire Chandler)Chandler argued the bills should not be fast-tracked because the process had been a rushed "stitch-up": the Senate inquiry was too short, Treasury officials admitted they hadn't read all submissions and couldn't say how much revenue the capital gains versus negative gearing changes would raise, key details are still to be set later, and the changes break an election promise not to touch capital gains tax or negative gearing.
Day by day
· Senate
Introduced — first reading
Senate · recorded
📄 Hansard, 22 June 2026
· Senate
Main debate — second reading
Senate · recorded
📄 Hansard, 22 June 2026
· Senate
Main debate — second reading
Senate · recorded
📄 Hansard, 23 June 2026
· Senate
Main debate — second reading
Senate · recorded
📄 Hansard, 24 June 2026
· Senate
Amendments debated — consideration in detail
That schedules 1 and 2 stand as printed.” — 34 to 25, agreed.
That the amendments on sheet AU131 be agreed to.Government's circulated amendments toTreasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 11 to 40, rejected.
That the amendments on sheet 3886 be agreed to.Australian Greens' circulated amendmentsto theTreasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 33 to 26, agreed.
That the amendments on sheets 3869, 3872, 3873, 3874, 3875, 3876, 3877 and 3879 be agreed to.Senator David Pocock's circulated amendments to theTreasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 26 to 33, rejected.
That One Nation's amendments on sheet 3896 to Jacqui Lambie Network and Senator David Pocock's amendment on sheet 3880 be agreed to.One Nation's circulated amendments to Jacqui Lambie Network and David Pocock's circulated amendment to the Treasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 24 to 35, rejected.
That the amendments on sheets 3869, 3872, 3873, 3874, 3875, 3876, 3877 and 3879 be agreed to.Senator David Pocock's circulated amendments to theTreasury Laws Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 26 to 33, rejected.
That the requests for amendment on sheet 3895 be agreed to.One Nation's circulatedrequestsforamendmentstothe Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 26 to 34, rejected.
That the requests for amendment on sheet 3895 be agreed to.One Nation's circulatedrequestsforamendmentstothe Income Tax Rates Amendment (Tax Reform No.” — 26 to 34, rejected.
That Senator Pocock's amendment be agreed to.The question now is that the remaining stages of the bill be agreed to, and the bills be now passed.” — 35 to 25, agreed.
That the Senate's amendments be agreed to.” — 98 to 39, agreed.
Senate · recorded
📄 Hansard, 25 June 2026
· House
Other chamber's response considered
House · recorded
📄 Hansard, 25 June 2026
Why does a bill need both chambers? How Parliament works →
Every step links to that day's Hansard. This is what no newspaper shows you.