AU Parliament
Sign in
◆ Bill · its whole journey
← The Floor ·
Bill · HouseFailed 39–92
Health · Medicare incentive payments

Put Medicare's GP bulk-billing incentive payments on a clear legal footing — back it or block it?

This bill creates a clear, permanent legal framework for the Commonwealth's primary care incentive payment programs — worth more than $1.4 billion a year — including the Medicare Bulk Billing Practice Incentive Program, which pays GP clinics extra to bulk-bill. The government says these programs currently run without a dedicated legislative basis, which weakens administration, compliance and integrity checks. Eligibility rules and payment amounts stay the same, and existing participants won't need to reapply. The bill also allows some routine decisions to be handled automatically with review rights, and renames the Health Insurance Act 1973 as the Medicare Act.

All speakers recorded were Labor MPs backing the bill. An amendment moved by the member for Lindsay was rejected 39 votes to 92.

🗳 A public mood-check, not a scientific poll. Vote to reveal how the chamber voted.
🗳 be the first to weigh in🏛 1h 1m debated
In progress · before its first chamber

⚖ The case each way

For · Government (Labor)Labor says these incentive programs have long operated without a proper legal foundation, which limits compliance, integrity and efficient administration. The bill gives clinics and government more certainty, protects public funding by tightening rules on overpayments, and keeps eligibility and payment levels unchanged — underpinning the record bulk-billing investment that has lifted the national bulk-billing rate to 81.9 per cent.
NoteOnly one side has spoken so far. We don't invent the other — when it's said on the record, it appears here.
Day by day
· House
Main debate — second reading
House · recorded
📄 Hansard, 2 July 2026
Why does a bill need both chambers? How Parliament works →
Every step links to that day's Hansard. This is what no newspaper shows you.